← Tuesday's Code

How Teams Win Grants Together 👥

Four roles, one system, better proposals

October 8, 2025
💰 Fundraising👥 4 Roles⚡ Real Workflows

Same automation. Four completely different workflows.

Tuesday you saw the code. Today you see how real team members actually use it. Grant writers extract requirements. EDs review strategy. Program managers provide evidence. Finance leads validate budgets.

Team Workflows

✍️

Grant Writer

8 hours → 90 min per proposal

81%
Faster

Before

Read 40-page RFP manually (2 hours) - highlight requirements
Create requirement matrix in Excel (3 hours) - prone to missing items
Draft responses from scratch (3 hours) - reinventing wheel each time

After

Upload RFP to AI (30 seconds)
Review extracted requirements matrix (15 min) - AI caught everything
Use AI-generated draft as starting point (45 min editing vs 3 hours writing)
Focus on storytelling, not formatting (30 min)
📄Upload RFP30 sec🤖AI Extract2 minReview Matrix15 min✍️Edit Draft45 minFinal Polish30 min
Volume
2-3 proposals/week typical
Saved
6.5 hours × 3 = 19.5 hours saved weekly
Quality
Zero missed requirements vs 15% miss rate before
Outcome
Handle 5 proposals/week without overtime

"I finally have time to make proposals compelling, not just compliant."

— Grant Writer, 7 years nonprofit fundraising

How Roles Work Together Through the System

Watch how four team members collaborate on one high-stakes proposal without endless meetings.

🚨

Federal grant for youth mental health program - $500K over 3 years

✍️
Grant Writer
Day 1, 9am
Uploads 63-page RFP, AI extracts 47 requirements in 2 minutes
🤖
AI System
Day 1, 9:02am
Flags gap: 'Requires evidence of prior mental health outcomes - none in system'
📋
Program Manager
Day 1, 10am
Receives specific request: '3-year outcome data for anxiety reduction in teens'
📋
Program Manager
Day 2, 2pm
Submits data: '78% reduction in anxiety scores, n=340 participants, 2022-2024'
💰
Finance Lead
Day 3, 11am
Reviews AI-generated budget, adjusts indirect rate from 15% to 12% per org policy
🎯
Executive Director
Day 4, 3pm
Sees dashboard: 100% complete, 96% alignment score, approves for submission
💡

Four people, four days, zero meetings. The system routed work to the right person at the right time.

Practice-Wide Impact

MetricBeforeAfterImprovement
Proposals/Month3-4 proposals8-10 proposals
+150%
Win Rate28% funded47% funded
+68%
Staff Overtime12 hrs/week avg2 hrs/week avg
-83%
Missed Requirements15% of proposals0% of proposals
100%

Getting Your Team On Board

⚠️
Fear

Grant writers think AI will make proposals generic and soulless

💡
Response

Show side-by-side: AI handles compliance matrix, writers add compelling stories. 'You write the heart, AI handles the checklist.'

Result

Writers see they spend 80% of time on storytelling vs 20% before. Buy-in happens fast.

⚠️
Fear

Executive Director worried about losing control over messaging

💡
Response

Demo the approval dashboard: ED sees every proposal before submission, with AI flagging strategic misalignment early.

Result

ED realizes they catch issues in 20 minutes vs 3 hours of reading. Control increases, time decreases.

⚠️
Fear

Program managers don't want to be bothered with 'more grant stuff'

💡
Response

Show before/after: vague requests ('need program data') vs specific questions ('3-year anxiety reduction rates, ages 13-17').

Result

Program managers appreciate clarity. They answer questions faster because they know exactly what's needed.

⚠️
Fear

Finance lead concerned AI will mess up budget math

💡
Response

Run parallel for 2 weeks: manual budgets + AI budgets. AI catches 3 math errors humans missed.

Result

Finance lead becomes biggest advocate. Trust built through accuracy data.

⚠️
Fear

Board worried about upfront investment with uncertain ROI

💡
Response

Calculate: 50 hours saved/month × $45/hour = $2,250/month = $27K/year. System pays for itself in 2 months.

Result

Show monthly savings chart. Board approves unanimously.

💰

Want This for Your Team?

We'll show your grant writers, ED, program staff, and finance lead exactly how they'll each use it. Custom demo for your org.