Same automation. Four different workflows.
Tuesday you saw the code. Today you see how writers, SEO specialists, merchandisers, and ops leads each use it differently.
Team Workflows
Content Writer
45 min → 5 min per product
Before
After
"I went from writing 5 descriptions a day to editing 40. Same quality, 8x output."
— Content Writer, 4 years e-commerce
How Roles Work Together
Watch how the team handles a product launch using the automated system.
New product launch: 150 SKUs need descriptions by Friday
What used to take 3 weeks and stress the team now happens in 4 days with zero overtime.
Practice-Wide Impact
| Metric | Before | After | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Output | 50 descriptions | 500 descriptions | 10x |
| Time per Product | 45 minutes | 5 minutes | 89% faster |
| SEO Optimization | 60% compliant | 95% compliant | +35% |
| A/B Test Volume | 20 products/month | 200 products/month | 10x |
Getting Your Team On Board
Writers think AI will replace them
Show time savings data: 'You'll spend 80% less time writing, 80% more time editing and strategizing'
Frame as 'assistant' not 'replacement'. Writers become editors and brand guardians.
SEO worried AI can't do natural keyword insertion
Run parallel test: manual vs AI for 50 products. Show 95% SEO score vs 60% manual.
SEO sees AI catches keyword opportunities they missed. Trust builds through data.
Merchandiser concerned about losing creative control
Demonstrate 3-variation system: 'You pick the winner, AI gives you options'
More testing = better decisions. Control increases, not decreases.
Ops worried about upfront cost and learning curve
Calculate ROI: 13.5 hours/week saved × $40/hour = $2,160/month savings. 2-month payback.
Show monthly savings chart. Decision becomes obvious.
Team thinks AI output will sound robotic
Blind test: show 10 descriptions, ask which are AI. Team can't tell 80% of the time.
Quality concerns vanish when they see real output. Editing fixes the rest.