ποΈ Microfrontend Architecture
From 3 Weeks to Daily Deploys
Transform monolithic enterprise platforms into independently deployable applications. Each team owns their complete experienceβfrom UI to API integrationβwhile seamlessly consuming shared services. 21Γ faster feature delivery.
Microfrontend Architecture Transformation
From 3-week synchronized releases to daily independent deployments
By breaking the monolith into independent microfrontends, we went from 17 releases per year to 260 releases per year per team. That's 21Γ faster feature delivery with zero coordination overhead.
π¨ The Problem
Monolithic enterprise platforms cripple team velocity
3-Week Cycles
All teams wait for synchronized releases
Merge Hell
4 teams, one codebase = constant conflicts
One Bug = All Down
Single failure blocks everyone
Zero Autonomy
Teams can't move independently
The Microfrontend Solution
Independent applications, shared services, complete autonomy
Deploy daily (not every 3 weeks)
Complete team ownership
Independent release cycles
Isolated failures (25% blast radius)
21Γ faster feature delivery
Zero coordination meetings
See the Transformation
Toggle between monolith and microfrontend to see how architecture impacts deployment velocity
Microfrontend Architecture for Healthcare
Transform monolithic platforms into independently deployable portals
β Monolithic Architecture
Single Healthcare Application
All portals in one monolithic codebase
Patient Portal
Provider Portal
Admin Portal
Billing Portal
Impact Analysis
Before (Monolith)
After (Microfrontend)
21Γ
Faster deploys
4β0
Hours coordinating
100%
Team autonomy
How It Works
1. Module Federation (Webpack 5)
Each portal builds as independent app, consumed by shell application at runtime
2. Shared Service Layer
Auth, Data, Payment APIs consumed by all portals via standardized contracts
3. Independent CI/CD
Each LOB has own pipeline: Git push β Build β Test β Deploy (15 min)
4. Feature Flags
Dark launches, A/B testing, gradual rollouts per LOB without coordination
π― Real-World Scenario:
Monday 9 AM: Auto team discovers they can improve quote flow.
Monday 2 PM: Feature coded and tested.
Monday 4 PM: Deployed to production (Auto LOB only).
Result: Home, PowerSports, and Rental teams unaffected, working on their own features.
Monolith equivalent: Would need to wait 3 weeks, coordinate with 4 teams, risk blocking everyone if something breaks. Microfrontend = ship in same day.
Enterprise Use Case Summary
Problem:
Healthcare platform with 4 portals locked in 3-week release cycles. Teams frustrated by coordination overhead, merge conflicts, and inability to move fast.
Solution:
Microfrontend architecture where each portal (Patient, Provider, Admin, Billing) becomes independently deployable application. Teams own complete user experience while integrating with shared Auth, Data, Payment, and Notification services.
Results:
- Deployment frequency: 3 weeks β Daily (21Γ faster)
- Team autonomy: 0% β 100%
- Coordination meetings: 4 hours/release β 0
- Blast radius: 100% β 25% (per portal)
- Feature velocity: 17/year β 260/year per portal
- Developer satisfaction: Up 80%
Tech Stack:
Webpack Module Federation, React, TypeScript, Shared Design System, API Gateway, Feature Flags, Independent CI/CD per portal
π₯ Real-World Example: Healthcare Platform
The Scenario
Large healthcare company with monolithic platform serving 4 distinct portals:
π€ Patient Portal
Appointments, records, billing
βοΈ Provider Portal
Scheduling, notes, prescriptions
π¨βπΌ Admin Portal
Staff management, reporting
π³ Billing Portal
Claims, payments, insurance
Before (Monolith)
- βPatient team ready β waits 2 weeks for Billing team
- βProvider portal bug blocks entire platform
- β4-hour weekly coordination meetings
- βMerge conflicts daily
- β~17 releases per year
After (Microfrontend)
- β Each portal deploys independently, daily
- β Provider bug? Only affects Provider portal
- β Zero coordination meetings needed
- β No merge conflicts (separate repos)
- β ~260 releases per year (per portal)
Shared Services Layer
All portals consume same backend services via APIs:
π
Auth Service
π
Data Service
π³
Payment Service
π§
Notification Service
β‘ Live Deployment Simulator
Watch teams deploy in real-time. See the difference between architectures.
β‘ Live Deployment Simulator
Watch how teams deploy in real-time. Each "day" = 0.5 seconds.
Patient Portal
Ready day 10
Provider Portal
Ready day 15
Admin Portal
Ready day 12
Billing Portal
Ready day 18
Architecture Breakdown
Toggle between views to see structural differences
Microfrontend Architecture for Healthcare
Transform monolithic platforms into independently deployable portals
β Monolithic Architecture
Single Healthcare Application
All portals in one monolithic codebase
Patient Portal
Provider Portal
Admin Portal
Billing Portal
Impact Analysis
Before (Monolith)
After (Microfrontend)
21Γ
Faster deploys
4β0
Hours coordinating
100%
Team autonomy
How It Works
1. Module Federation (Webpack 5)
Each portal builds as independent app, consumed by shell application at runtime
2. Shared Service Layer
Auth, Data, Payment APIs consumed by all portals via standardized contracts
3. Independent CI/CD
Each LOB has own pipeline: Git push β Build β Test β Deploy (15 min)
4. Feature Flags
Dark launches, A/B testing, gradual rollouts per LOB without coordination
π― Real-World Scenario:
Monday 9 AM: Auto team discovers they can improve quote flow.
Monday 2 PM: Feature coded and tested.
Monday 4 PM: Deployed to production (Auto LOB only).
Result: Home, PowerSports, and Rental teams unaffected, working on their own features.
Monolith equivalent: Would need to wait 3 weeks, coordinate with 4 teams, risk blocking everyone if something breaks. Microfrontend = ship in same day.
Enterprise Use Case Summary
Problem:
Healthcare platform with 4 portals locked in 3-week release cycles. Teams frustrated by coordination overhead, merge conflicts, and inability to move fast.
Solution:
Microfrontend architecture where each portal (Patient, Provider, Admin, Billing) becomes independently deployable application. Teams own complete user experience while integrating with shared Auth, Data, Payment, and Notification services.
Results:
- Deployment frequency: 3 weeks β Daily (21Γ faster)
- Team autonomy: 0% β 100%
- Coordination meetings: 4 hours/release β 0
- Blast radius: 100% β 25% (per portal)
- Feature velocity: 17/year β 260/year per portal
- Developer satisfaction: Up 80%
Tech Stack:
Webpack Module Federation, React, TypeScript, Shared Design System, API Gateway, Feature Flags, Independent CI/CD per portal
How It Works
1. Module Federation (Webpack 5)
Each portal builds as independent application, dynamically loaded by shell app at runtime.
// patient-portal/webpack.config.js module.exports = { plugins: [ new ModuleFederationPlugin({ name: 'patientPortal', filename: 'remoteEntry.js', exposes: { './PatientApp': './src/App', }, shared: { react: { singleton: true }, 'shared-design-system': {}, }, }), ], };
2. Independent CI/CD Pipelines
Each team has own repo, pipeline, deployment schedule. Git push β Production in 15 minutes.
β Patient Portal: Deploy at 10 AM
β Provider Portal: Deploy at 2 PM
β Admin Portal: Deploy at 4 PM
β Billing Portal: Deploy next day
No coordination needed!
3. Shared Service Contracts
Backend services expose standardized APIs. Portals consume without coupling.
// All portals use same API GET /api/auth/user GET /api/patients/{id} POST /api/appointments GET /api/billing/invoices // Versioned for backward compatibility GET /api/v2/patients/{id}
π Measurable Impact
21Γ
Faster deployments
3 weeks β Daily
100%
Team autonomy
Complete ownership
75%
Reduced blast radius
100% β 25% per module
π Ready to Modernize Your Platform?
Transform your monolith into independently deployable modules. Let's discuss your architecture and create a migration strategy.