Enterprise Architecture Case Study

πŸ—οΈ Microfrontend Architecture
From 3 Weeks to Daily Deploys

Transform monolithic enterprise platforms into independently deployable applications. Each team owns their complete experienceβ€”from UI to API integrationβ€”while seamlessly consuming shared services. 21Γ— faster feature delivery.

Microfrontend Architecture Transformation

From 3-week synchronized releases to daily independent deployments

Monolithic Application
All teams deploy together
Patient Portal
Blocked
Provider Portal
Blocked
Admin Portal
Blocked
Billing Portal
Blocked
One team's bug blocks everyone from deploying
4 hours of coordination meetings per release
Merge conflicts daily, innovation velocity crawls
3 Weeks
Release Cycle
4 hrs/release
Coordination Meetings
17/year
Annual Releases
100%
Blast Radius
The Transformation

By breaking the monolith into independent microfrontends, we went from 17 releases per year to 260 releases per year per team. That's 21Γ— faster feature delivery with zero coordination overhead.

🚨 The Problem

Monolithic enterprise platforms cripple team velocity

3-Week Cycles

All teams wait for synchronized releases

Merge Hell

4 teams, one codebase = constant conflicts

One Bug = All Down

Single failure blocks everyone

Zero Autonomy

Teams can't move independently

The Microfrontend Solution

Independent applications, shared services, complete autonomy

πŸš€

Deploy daily (not every 3 weeks)

πŸ‘₯

Complete team ownership

πŸ”„

Independent release cycles

πŸ›‘οΈ

Isolated failures (25% blast radius)

⚑

21Γ— faster feature delivery

🎯

Zero coordination meetings

Interactive Demo

See the Transformation

Toggle between monolith and microfrontend to see how architecture impacts deployment velocity

Microfrontend Architecture for Healthcare

Transform monolithic platforms into independently deployable portals

❌ Monolithic Architecture

Single Healthcare Application

All portals in one monolithic codebase

πŸ‘€

Patient Portal

βš•οΈ

Provider Portal

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό

Admin Portal

πŸ’³

Billing Portal

All teams must coordinate releases
One bug blocks entire deployment
3-week release cycles
Shared codebase = merge conflicts

Impact Analysis

Before (Monolith)
Deployment Frequency:Every 3 weeks
Team Dependencies:High
Release Coordination:4 hours meeting
Rollback Impact:All portals down
Feature Velocity:~17 deploys/year
Team Autonomy:Low
After (Microfrontend)
Deployment Frequency:Daily per portal
Team Dependencies:None
Release Coordination:0 minutes
Rollback Impact:Only 1 portal
Feature Velocity:~260 deploys/year
Team Autonomy:Complete

21Γ—

Faster deploys

4β†’0

Hours coordinating

100%

Team autonomy

How It Works

1. Module Federation (Webpack 5)

Each portal builds as independent app, consumed by shell application at runtime

2. Shared Service Layer

Auth, Data, Payment APIs consumed by all portals via standardized contracts

3. Independent CI/CD

Each LOB has own pipeline: Git push β†’ Build β†’ Test β†’ Deploy (15 min)

4. Feature Flags

Dark launches, A/B testing, gradual rollouts per LOB without coordination

🎯 Real-World Scenario:

Monday 9 AM: Auto team discovers they can improve quote flow.
Monday 2 PM: Feature coded and tested.
Monday 4 PM: Deployed to production (Auto LOB only).
Result: Home, PowerSports, and Rental teams unaffected, working on their own features.

Monolith equivalent: Would need to wait 3 weeks, coordinate with 4 teams, risk blocking everyone if something breaks. Microfrontend = ship in same day.

Enterprise Use Case Summary

Problem:

Healthcare platform with 4 portals locked in 3-week release cycles. Teams frustrated by coordination overhead, merge conflicts, and inability to move fast.

Solution:

Microfrontend architecture where each portal (Patient, Provider, Admin, Billing) becomes independently deployable application. Teams own complete user experience while integrating with shared Auth, Data, Payment, and Notification services.

Results:

  • Deployment frequency: 3 weeks β†’ Daily (21Γ— faster)
  • Team autonomy: 0% β†’ 100%
  • Coordination meetings: 4 hours/release β†’ 0
  • Blast radius: 100% β†’ 25% (per portal)
  • Feature velocity: 17/year β†’ 260/year per portal
  • Developer satisfaction: Up 80%

Tech Stack:

Webpack Module Federation, React, TypeScript, Shared Design System, API Gateway, Feature Flags, Independent CI/CD per portal

πŸ₯ Real-World Example: Healthcare Platform

The Scenario

Large healthcare company with monolithic platform serving 4 distinct portals:

πŸ‘€ Patient Portal

Appointments, records, billing

βš•οΈ Provider Portal

Scheduling, notes, prescriptions

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό Admin Portal

Staff management, reporting

πŸ’³ Billing Portal

Claims, payments, insurance

Before (Monolith)

  • ❌Patient team ready β†’ waits 2 weeks for Billing team
  • ❌Provider portal bug blocks entire platform
  • ❌4-hour weekly coordination meetings
  • ❌Merge conflicts daily
  • ❌~17 releases per year

After (Microfrontend)

  • βœ…Each portal deploys independently, daily
  • βœ…Provider bug? Only affects Provider portal
  • βœ…Zero coordination meetings needed
  • βœ…No merge conflicts (separate repos)
  • βœ…~260 releases per year (per portal)

Shared Services Layer

All portals consume same backend services via APIs:

πŸ”

Auth Service

πŸ“Š

Data Service

πŸ’³

Payment Service

πŸ“§

Notification Service

⚑ Live Deployment Simulator

Watch teams deploy in real-time. See the difference between architectures.

⚑ Live Deployment Simulator

Watch how teams deploy in real-time. Each "day" = 0.5 seconds.

πŸ‘€

Patient Portal

Ready day 10

Ready
βš•οΈ

Provider Portal

Ready day 15

Ready
πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό

Admin Portal

Ready day 12

Ready
πŸ’³

Billing Portal

Ready day 18

Ready

Architecture Breakdown

Toggle between views to see structural differences

Microfrontend Architecture for Healthcare

Transform monolithic platforms into independently deployable portals

❌ Monolithic Architecture

Single Healthcare Application

All portals in one monolithic codebase

πŸ‘€

Patient Portal

βš•οΈ

Provider Portal

πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό

Admin Portal

πŸ’³

Billing Portal

All teams must coordinate releases
One bug blocks entire deployment
3-week release cycles
Shared codebase = merge conflicts

Impact Analysis

Before (Monolith)
Deployment Frequency:Every 3 weeks
Team Dependencies:High
Release Coordination:4 hours meeting
Rollback Impact:All portals down
Feature Velocity:~17 deploys/year
Team Autonomy:Low
After (Microfrontend)
Deployment Frequency:Daily per portal
Team Dependencies:None
Release Coordination:0 minutes
Rollback Impact:Only 1 portal
Feature Velocity:~260 deploys/year
Team Autonomy:Complete

21Γ—

Faster deploys

4β†’0

Hours coordinating

100%

Team autonomy

How It Works

1. Module Federation (Webpack 5)

Each portal builds as independent app, consumed by shell application at runtime

2. Shared Service Layer

Auth, Data, Payment APIs consumed by all portals via standardized contracts

3. Independent CI/CD

Each LOB has own pipeline: Git push β†’ Build β†’ Test β†’ Deploy (15 min)

4. Feature Flags

Dark launches, A/B testing, gradual rollouts per LOB without coordination

🎯 Real-World Scenario:

Monday 9 AM: Auto team discovers they can improve quote flow.
Monday 2 PM: Feature coded and tested.
Monday 4 PM: Deployed to production (Auto LOB only).
Result: Home, PowerSports, and Rental teams unaffected, working on their own features.

Monolith equivalent: Would need to wait 3 weeks, coordinate with 4 teams, risk blocking everyone if something breaks. Microfrontend = ship in same day.

Enterprise Use Case Summary

Problem:

Healthcare platform with 4 portals locked in 3-week release cycles. Teams frustrated by coordination overhead, merge conflicts, and inability to move fast.

Solution:

Microfrontend architecture where each portal (Patient, Provider, Admin, Billing) becomes independently deployable application. Teams own complete user experience while integrating with shared Auth, Data, Payment, and Notification services.

Results:

  • Deployment frequency: 3 weeks β†’ Daily (21Γ— faster)
  • Team autonomy: 0% β†’ 100%
  • Coordination meetings: 4 hours/release β†’ 0
  • Blast radius: 100% β†’ 25% (per portal)
  • Feature velocity: 17/year β†’ 260/year per portal
  • Developer satisfaction: Up 80%

Tech Stack:

Webpack Module Federation, React, TypeScript, Shared Design System, API Gateway, Feature Flags, Independent CI/CD per portal

How It Works

1. Module Federation (Webpack 5)

Each portal builds as independent application, dynamically loaded by shell app at runtime.

// patient-portal/webpack.config.js
module.exports = {
  plugins: [
    new ModuleFederationPlugin({
      name: 'patientPortal',
      filename: 'remoteEntry.js',
      exposes: {
        './PatientApp': './src/App',
      },
      shared: {
        react: { singleton: true },
        'shared-design-system': {},
      },
    }),
  ],
};

2. Independent CI/CD Pipelines

Each team has own repo, pipeline, deployment schedule. Git push β†’ Production in 15 minutes.

βœ… Patient Portal: Deploy at 10 AM

βœ… Provider Portal: Deploy at 2 PM

βœ… Admin Portal: Deploy at 4 PM

βœ… Billing Portal: Deploy next day

No coordination needed!

3. Shared Service Contracts

Backend services expose standardized APIs. Portals consume without coupling.

// All portals use same API
GET /api/auth/user
GET /api/patients/{id}
POST /api/appointments
GET /api/billing/invoices

// Versioned for backward compatibility
GET /api/v2/patients/{id}

πŸ“Š Measurable Impact

21Γ—

Faster deployments

3 weeks β†’ Daily

100%

Team autonomy

Complete ownership

75%

Reduced blast radius

100% β†’ 25% per module

πŸš€ Ready to Modernize Your Platform?

Transform your monolith into independently deployable modules. Let's discuss your architecture and create a migration strategy.