Skip to main content
← Monday's Prompts

Automate Feature Feedback Analysis 🚀

Turn Monday's 3 prompts into production-ready clustering code

May 20, 2025
28 min read
📊 SaaS/Product🐍 Python + TypeScript⚡ 100 → 10,000 items/day

The Problem

On Monday you tested the 3 prompts in ChatGPT. You saw how clustering → prioritization → roadmap works. But here's the reality: you can't ask your PM to copy-paste 500 feedback items daily. One product manager spending 3 hours manually reviewing feedback? That's $150/day in labor costs (assuming $50/hr PM salary). Multiply that across a growing SaaS company and you're looking at $54,000/year just on feedback admin. Plus the context-switching that leads to missed patterns and delayed roadmap decisions. Your competitors with automated pipelines ship features 2x faster because they spot trends in real-time.

3+ hours
Per day reviewing feedback manually
60% missed
Important patterns lost in noise
Can't scale
Beyond 50-100 items/day

See It Work

Watch the 3 prompts chain together automatically. This is what you'll build.

Watch It Work

See the AI automation in action

Live Demo • No Setup Required

The Code

Three levels: start simple, add reliability, then scale to production. Pick where you are.

Basic = Quick startProduction = Full featuresAdvanced = Custom + Scale

Simple API Calls

Good for: 0-100 feedback items/day | Setup time: 30 minutes

Simple API Calls
Good for: 0-100 feedback items/day | Setup time: 30 minutes
# Simple API Calls (0-100 items/day)
import openai
import json
import os
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
from datetime import datetime

# Set your API key
openai.api_key = os.getenv('OPENAI_API_KEY')

def automate_feedback_analysis(feedback_items: List[Dict]) -> Dict:
    """
    Chain the 3 prompts: cluster → prioritize → roadmap
    
    Args:
Showing 15 of 175 lines

When to Scale

1

0-100 items/day

  • Direct OpenAI/Claude API calls
  • Sequential processing (no batching)
  • Basic error handling
  • Manual trigger (run on-demand)
Level Up
2

100-1,000 items/day

  • Batch processing (50 items/batch)
  • Parallel API calls (3-5 concurrent)
  • Exponential backoff retries
  • Basic logging to files
  • Scheduled runs (cron/lambda)
Level Up
3

1,000-5,000 items/day

  • Redis queue for async processing
  • Result caching (1 hour TTL)
  • Distributed workers (3-5 instances)
  • Structured logging (CloudWatch/Datadog)
  • Monitoring & alerts
  • Dead letter queue for failures
Level Up
4

5,000+ items/day

  • LangGraph orchestration
  • Specialized agents (clustering, prioritization, roadmap)
  • Vector DB for semantic clustering (Pinecone/Weaviate)
  • Real-time streaming updates
  • A/B testing different clustering strategies
  • Custom fine-tuned models
  • Multi-region deployment

SaaS/Product Gotchas

Real challenges you'll hit when automating feedback analysis. Here's how to handle them.

Duplicate Feedback Across Sources

Use fuzzy matching (Levenshtein distance) to detect duplicates before clustering.

Solution
# Deduplicate feedback using fuzzy matching
from difflib import SequenceMatcher

def is_duplicate(text1: str, text2: str, threshold: float = 0.85) -> bool:
    """Check if two feedback items are duplicates using fuzzy matching"""
    similarity = SequenceMatcher(None, text1.lower(), text2.lower()).ratio()
    return similarity >= threshold
Showing 8 of 39 lines

Vague Feedback Without Context

Enrich feedback with metadata (page URL, feature area, user segment) before clustering.

Solution
# Enrich vague feedback with context metadata
from typing import Dict, Optional

def enrich_feedback_context(item: Dict, metadata: Dict) -> Dict:
    """
    Add context to vague feedback using metadata from source system.
    
    Args:
Showing 8 of 53 lines

Sentiment Drift in Long Feedback

Split long feedback into sentences, analyze sentiment per sentence, flag negative sentences separately.

Solution
# Handle mixed sentiment in long feedback
import re
from typing import List, Dict

def analyze_sentence_sentiment(text: str) -> float:
    """
    Placeholder for sentence-level sentiment analysis.
    In production, use a proper sentiment model (transformers, etc.)
Showing 8 of 69 lines

Feature Request vs Bug Report Confusion

Add classification step before clustering. Tag as 'feature_request', 'bug', 'feedback', or 'question'.

Solution
# Classify feedback type before clustering
from typing import Dict, Literal

FeedbackType = Literal['feature_request', 'bug', 'feedback', 'question']

def classify_feedback_type(item: Dict) -> FeedbackType:
    """
    Classify feedback into type using keyword patterns.
Showing 8 of 60 lines

Stale Feedback Skewing Priorities

Add time decay to feedback weight. Recent feedback (< 1 month) gets full weight, older feedback decays exponentially.

Solution
# Apply time decay to feedback weight
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
import math

def calculate_feedback_weight(item: Dict, decay_days: int = 30) -> float:
    """
    Calculate weight for feedback based on recency.
    Recent feedback (< decay_days) gets full weight (1.0).
Showing 8 of 84 lines

Adjust Your Numbers

500
105,000
5 min
1 min60 min
$50/hr
$15/hr$200/hr

❌ Manual Process

Time per item:5 min
Cost per item:$4.17
Daily volume:500 items
Daily:$2,083
Monthly:$45,833
Yearly:$550,000

✅ AI-Automated

Time per item:~2 sec
API cost:$0.02
Review (10%):$0.42
Daily:$218
Monthly:$4,803
Yearly:$57,640

You Save

0/day
90% cost reduction
Monthly Savings
$41,030
Yearly Savings
$492,360
💡 ROI payback: Typically 1-2 months for basic implementation
📊

Want This Running in Your Product?

We build custom SaaS AI systems that turn feedback chaos into actionable roadmaps. From clustering to prioritization to roadmap generation. Production-ready, not prototypes.

©

2026 Randeep Bhatia. All Rights Reserved.

No part of this content may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form without prior written permission.